Which of the following scenarios would be an example of coercion on the part of a lender

Try the new Google Books

Check out the new look and enjoy easier access to your favorite features

Which of the following scenarios would be an example of coercion on the part of a lender

Try the new Google Books

Check out the new look and enjoy easier access to your favorite features

Which of the following scenarios would be an example of coercion on the part of a lender

Restrictions put on debt agreements by the lender to limit the borrower's actions

Debt covenants are restrictions that lenders (creditors, debt holders, investors) put on lending agreements to limit the actions of the borrower (debtor). In other words, debt covenants are agreements between a company and its lenders that the company will operate within certain rules set by the lenders. They are also called banking covenants or financial covenants.

Which of the following scenarios would be an example of coercion on the part of a lender

The Purpose of Debt Covenants

Debt covenants are not used to place a burden on the borrower. Rather, they are used to align the interests of the principal and agent, as well as solve agency problems between the management (borrower) and debt holders (lenders).

Debt covenant implications for the lender and the borrower include the following:

Lender 

Debt restrictions protect the lender by prohibiting certain actions by the borrowers. Debt covenants restrict borrowers from taking actions that can result in a significant adverse impact or increased risk for the lender.

Borrower

Debt restrictions benefit the borrower by reducing the cost of borrowing. For example, if lenders are able to impose restrictions, lenders will be willing to impose a lower interest rate for the debt to compensate for abiding by the restrictions.

Reasons Why Debt Covenants are Used

Note that in the scenarios below, it is in the best interest of both parties to set debt covenants. Without such agreements, lenders may be reluctant to lend money to a company.

Scenario 1

Lender A lends $1 million to a company. Based on the risk profile of the company, the lender lends at an annual interest rate of 7%. If there are no covenants, the company can immediately borrow $10 million from another lender (Lender B).

In this scenario, Lender A would set a debt restriction. They’ve calculated an interest rate of 7% based on the risk profile of the company. If the company turns around and borrows more money from additional lenders, the loan will be a riskier proposition. Therefore, there will be a higher possibility of the company defaulting on its loan repayment to Lender A.

Scenario 2

Lender A lends $10 million to a company. In the following days, the company declares a liquidating dividend to all shareholders.

In this scenario, Lender A will set a dividend restriction. Without the restriction, the company can pay out all of its earnings or liquidate its assets and pay a liquidating dividend to all shareholders. Therefore, the lender would be out of his or her money if the company were to liquidate the company and pay out a liquidating dividend.

List of Debt Covenants

Below is a list of the top 10 most common metrics lenders use as debt covenants for borrowers:

Positive vs Negative Covenants

Debt covenants are defined as positive covenants or negative covenants.

Positive debt covenants are covenants that state what the borrower must do. For example:

  • Achieve a certain threshold in certain financial ratios
  • Ensure facilities and factories are in good working condition
  • Perform regular maintenance of capital assets
  • Provide yearly audited financial statements
  • Ensure accounting practices are in accordance with GAAP

Negative debt covenants are covenants that state what the borrower cannot do. For example:

  • Pay cash dividends over a certain amount or predetermined threshold
  • Sell certain assets
  • Borrow more debt
  • Issue debt more senior than the current debt
  • Enter into certain types of agreements or leases
  • Partake in certain M&A

Example

Let us consider a simple example. A lender enters into a debt agreement with a company. The debt agreement could specify the following debt covenants:

  • The company must maintain an interest coverage ratio of 3.70 based on cash flow from operations
  • The company cannot pay annual cash dividends exceeding 60% of net earnings
  • The company cannot borrow debt that is senior to this debt

Violation of Debt Covenants

When a debt covenant is violated, depending on the severity, the lender can do several things:

  • Demand penalty payment
  • Increase the predetermined interest rate
  • Increase the amount of collateral
  • Demand full immediate repayment of the loan
  • Terminate the debt agreement

CFI is a global provider of financial modeling courses and also offers financial analyst certification training. To advance your career as an analyst, these CFI resources will be helpful:

Unconscionable conduct is generally understood to mean conduct which is so harsh that it goes against good conscience. Under the Australian Consumer Law, businesses must not engage in unconscionable conduct, when dealing with other businesses or their customers

Unconscionable conduct does not have a precise legal definition as it is a concept that has been developed on a case-by-case basis by courts over time. Conduct may be unconscionable if it is particularly harsh or oppressive. To be considered unconscionable, conduct it must be more than simply unfair—it must be against conscience as judged against the norms of society.

Business behaviour may be deemed unconscionable if it is particularly harsh or oppressive, and is beyond hard commercial bargaining.

For example, Australian courts have found transactions or dealings to be 'unconscionable' when they are deliberate, involve serious misconduct or involve conduct which is clearly unfair and unreasonable.

There are a number of factors a court will consider when assessing whether conduct in relation to the selling or supplying of goods and services to a customer, or to the supplying or acquiring of goods or services to or from a business, is unconscionable.

These include:

  • the relative bargaining strength of the parties
  • whether any conditions were imposed on the weaker party that were not reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the stronger party
  • whether the weaker party could understand the documentation used
  • the use of undue influence, pressure or unfair tactics by the stronger party
  • the requirements of applicable industry codes
  • the willingness of the stronger party to negotiate
  • the extent to which the parties acted in good faith.

This is not an exhaustive list and it should be noted that the court may also consider any other factor it thinks relevant.

The following practical tips may assist businesses to avoid becoming a victim of unconscionable conduct:

  • ensure all commercial agreements are in writing
  • make sure you fully understand all the terms of the transaction
  • do not sign any agreements without reading them carefully
  • ask for plain language explanations and obtain independent professional legal or financial advice if unsure
  • if you think you are being treated differently, ask why
  • do not allow yourself to be talked into a deal that is wrong for you by high pressure sales tactics. Be wary of tight decision deadlines
  • look for the best deal and try to negotiate the outcome you want
  • be prepared to walk away from a deal that does not ‘feel’ right. It could be an unreasonable or oppressive deal.

The following practical tips may assist businesses to avoid engaging in unconscionable conduct:

  • do not exploit the other party when negotiating the terms of an agreement or contract
  • take care to be reasonable when exercising your rights under a contract
  • consider the characteristics and vulnerabilities of your customers. For example, use plain English when dealing with customers from a non-English speaking background
  • make sure your contracts are thorough, easy to understand, not too lengthy and do not include harsh, unfair or oppressive terms
  • ensure you have clearly disclosed important or unusual terms or conditions of an agreement
  • ensure customers understand the terms of any agreement associated with the transaction and give them the opportunity to consider the offer properly. If the contract is long, you may decide to provide a summary of the key terms
  • observe any cooling-off periods that may apply or consider offering a cooling-off period
  • give customers the opportunity to seek advice about the contract before they sign it
  • if things go wrong, be open to resolving complaints
  • do not reward your staff for unfair, pressure-based selling.

If the court determines that unconscionable conduct has occurred, a variety of remedies may be ordered including:

  • compensation for loss or damage
  • financial penalties
  • having the contract declared void in whole or in part
  • having the contract or arrangement varied
  • a refund or performance of specified services.

Business snapshot – Unconscionable conduct

Make a consumer complaint

Make a complaint as a business