What is the difference between imperialism in the 16th 18th centuries and the new imperialism of the 19th and 20th centuries?

Yes.

To best answer this question, I feel like a direct comparison between these two events is necessary.

OLD IMPERIALISM (c. 1450 - 1750)

Old Imperialism is a term used to describe the imperialistic events of the Europeans towards the indigenous tribes of America. It all started when Christopher Columbus sailed across the waters to America.

1. Motives

The motives for this wave of imperialism could be summed up in three words: gold, God, and glory. You may of heard these before.

  • Gold. Europeans wanted a lot of gold since their supply back home was running out. Constant wars with neighboring countries and frequent peasant revolts didn't come cheap.

  • God. Europe also wanted to spread the word of God. Lots of missionaries and activists traveled about, jumping at every opportunity to convert people.

  • Glory. Europe's heavy view of ethnocentrism acted as a catalyst to conquering lesser advanced civilizations. They thrived to make a mark everywhere they go, and wanted it to stay.

And just a side note, gold was an active reason, while God and glory were passive.

2. Contact

When Europeans encountered the indigenous tribes for the first time, it did not end well. They killed thousands, decimated their homes, and took their lands.

They forcefully converted almost the entire population to Christianity through ways like Residential schools. They also enslaved many people.

NEW IMPERIALISM (c. 1881 - 1914)

Before I get started, I would like to point out that the information presented in the following lines are specifically from African imperialism. I'm not exactly an expert as to what happened to other places during the era of New Imperialism, but the ideology should be somewhat similar.

1. Motives

This time around, the motives were way better. Of course, they weren't great, but at least they were better than the old views of gold, God, and glory - kill everyone, take their land, and here, have my smallpox. Europeans actually wanted to help the people of Africa. This was because of their new views like the White Man's Burden. But of course, they were also still greedy for territory.

2. Contact

European colonialism brought many forms of sports to Africa, connecting it to the rest of the world like the African Cup of Nations (soccer tournament). The previous form of government, like the Isalmic rule, was also way worse to the society than the European rule. Europe even abolished some forms of slavery! European imperialism also brought over education, and the basis of which is still being used today. Europe brought over new cures and treatments for diseases, helping millions of people in Africa to live cleaner lives.

There! Hope this helps.

📚

 > 

đŸ‡ȘđŸ‡ș 

 > 

✊

What is the difference between imperialism in the 16th 18th centuries and the new imperialism of the 19th and 20th centuries?

AP European History đŸ‡ȘđŸ‡ș

Bookmarked 4.4k â€ą 335 resources

Old Imperialism of the 16th and 17th centuries focused mainly on “Gold, Glory and God” as the motivations for exploration. Stories of mythical cities of gold and promises of riches kept Europeans searching all over the world, mostly the Americas, tearing through native populations, and claiming land for their nations. This land was used for slave labor and the production of raw materials they couldn’t produce for themselves. However, this harsh lifestyle enforced by Europeans was lost to revolutions and revolts by natives and slaves.

New Imperialism focuses on the extension of a nation’s influence over another. Rather than “conquering” another nation, governments will seek to establish military bases, use colonies for cheap resources, and use their markets to sell manufactured goods. Most new imperialist endeavors focused on Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.

What is the difference between imperialism in the 16th 18th centuries and the new imperialism of the 19th and 20th centuries?

đŸŽ„ Watch: AP European History - 19th Century -isms

Old Imperialism focused on physical endeavors of establishing a colony they must maintain and control, or searching for riches. New Imperialism searched for cheap resources, crops, or labor in order to mass manufacture goods to then sell to their domestic and foreign markets. This created large profits for imperialist nations due to extremely low costs of production and guaranteed markets in which to sell. Europeans and Americans worked on maintaining control over strategic interests for resources, as well as responding to events involving Europeans or Americans around the world. 

Protestant mission work became equal to Catholic mission work as Protestant faiths grew in Europe. The Catholic Church no longer dominated European politics and many nations under the control of Europeans were of different global religions. Europeans involved themselves in the Ottoman Empire to maintain “protection” over religious sites and peoples. 

Europeans had come to believe that having colonies was an important means of showing power. Old Imperialism required maintaining an area as a physical colony while New Imperialism focused on expanding influence over local governments, using colonies for military bases, establishing black markets in which to sell manufactured goods to take over the existing markets, building railroads, and the use of modern weaponry.

Imperialist tensions arose over the Eastern Question concerning the fate of the decaying Ottoman Empire also. European nations colonized or took control over territories formerly owned by the Ottomans or close to the Ottoman Empire to have influence over the area.

đŸŽ„ Watch: AP European History - Imperialism

Free trade agreements allowed for European nations and America to introduce cheap or necessary goods into another country’s market that would cause a future demand for that good. Examples were vaccines, weapons, foods, textiles, and other manufactured goods. This demand allowed European and American governments to establish an economic influence over these countries to control and determine the terms of trade agreements.

The terminology “spheres of influence” was used to describe the direct or indirect involvement of a European nation or America in another nation’s politics, economy, religion, or society. Europeans and Americans would colonize a region or establish a protectorate in order to influence other aspects of life in that region or the areas around that region. A perfect example of this is a coined phrase “The sun never sets on the British Empire.” This is referring to the scope of the British sphere of influence and colonial holdings during the 19th century.

What is the difference between imperialism in the 16th 18th centuries and the new imperialism of the 19th and 20th centuries?

Protectorates were established in non-Western territories by Europeans or Americans in order to protect their interests in that country. Interests were mostly economic or religious. The French established protectorates in Vietnam, Indochina, and the surrounding region. The British annexed India, and with the French, protectorates over Egypt and Tunisia. The United States annexed Hawaii and established a protectorate over the Philippines. 

Was this guide helpful?

If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.