Which qualitative method is used to produce straightforward description?

  1. Ritchie J, Lewis J: Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2003, London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ives J, Damery S, Redwod S: PPI, paradoxes and Plato: who's sailing the ship?. J Med Ethics. 2013, 39 (3): 181-185. 10.1136/medethics-2011-100150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heath G, Cameron E, Cummins C, Greenfield S, Pattison H, Kelly D, Redwood S: Paediatric ‘care closer to home’: stake-holder views and barriers to implementation. Health Place. 2012, 18 (5): 1068-1073. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elkington H, White P, Addington-Hall J, Higgs R, Petternari C: The last year of life of COPD: a qualitative study of symptoms and services. Respir Med. 2004, 98 (5): 439-445. 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Murtagh J, Dixey R, Rudolf M: A qualitative investigation into the levers and barriers to weight loss in children: opinions of obese children. Archives Dis Child. 2006, 91 (11): 920-923. 10.1136/adc.2005.085712.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnard M, Webster S, O’Connor W, Jones A, Donmall M: The drug treatment outcomes research study (DTORS): qualitative study. 2009, London: Home Office

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ayatollahi H, Bath PA, Goodacre S: Factors influencing the use of IT in the emergency department: a qualitative study. Health Inform J. 2010, 16 (3): 189-200. 10.1177/1460458210377480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheard L, Prout H, Dowding D, Noble S, Watt I, Maraveyas A, Johnson M: Barriers to the diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in advanced cancer patients: a qualitative study. Palliative Med. 2012, 27 (2): 339-348.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis J, Wagland R, Tishelman C, Williams ML, Bailey CD, Haines J, Caress A, Lorigan P, Smith JA, Booton R, et al: Considerations in developing and delivering a nonpharmacological intervention for symptom management in lung cancer: the views of patients and informal caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manag (0). 2012, 44 (6): 831-842. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.12.274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gale N, Sultan H: Telehealth as ‘peace of mind’: embodiment, emotions and the home as the primary health space for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. Health place. 2013, 21: 140-147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rashidian A, Eccles MP, Russell I: Falling on stony ground? A qualitative study of implementation of clinical guidelines’ prescribing recommendations in primary care. Health policy. 2008, 85 (2): 148-161. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones RK: The unsolicited diary as a qualitative research tool for advanced research capacity in the field of health and illness. Qualitative Health Res. 2000, 10 (4): 555-567. 10.1177/104973200129118543.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N: Analysing qualitative data. British Med J. 2000, 320: 114-116. 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pope C, Mays N: Critical reflections on the rise of qualitative research. British Med J. 2009, 339: 737-739.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fairclough N: Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. 2010, London: Longman

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Garfinkel H: Ethnomethodology’s program. Soc Psychol Quarter. 1996, 59 (1): 5-21. 10.2307/2787116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Merleau-Ponty M: The phenomenology of perception. 1962, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

    Google Scholar 

  18. Svenaeus F: The phenomenology of health and illness. Handbook of phenomenology and medicine. 2001, Netherlands: Springer, 87-108.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Reissmann CK: Narrative methods for the human sciences. 2008, London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  20. Charmaz K: Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. 2006, London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glaser A, Strauss AL: The discovery of grounded theory. 1967, Chicago: Aldine

    Google Scholar 

  22. Crotty M: The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. 1998, London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boeije H: A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002, 36 (4): 391-409. 10.1023/A:1020909529486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005, 15 (9): 1277-1288. 10.1177/1049732305276687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Redwood S, Gale NK, Greenfield S: ‘You give us rangoli, we give you talk’: using an art-based activity to elicit data from a seldom heard group. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012, 12 (1): 7-10.1186/1471-2288-12-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Mishler EG: The struggle between the voice of medicine and the voice of the lifeworld. The sociology of health and illness: critical perspectives. Edited by: Conrad P, Kern R. 1990, New York: St Martins Press, Third

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hodges BD, Kuper A, Reeves S: Discourse analysis. British Med J. 2008, 337: 570-572. 10.1136/bmj.39370.701782.DE.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sandelowski M, Barroso J: Writing the proposal for a qualitative research methodology project. Qual Health Res. 2003, 13 (6): 781-820. 10.1177/1049732303013006003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ellins J: It’s better together: involving older people in research. HSMC Newsletter Focus Serv Users Publ. 2010, 16 (1): 4-

    Google Scholar 

  30. Phillimore J, Goodson L, Hennessy D, Ergun E: Empowering Birmingham’s migrant and refugee community organisations: making a difference. 2009, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leamy M, Clough R: How older people became researchers. 2006, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  32. Glasby J, Miller R, Ellins J, Durose J, Davidson D, McIver S, Littlechild R, Tanner D, Snelling I, Spence K: Final report NIHR service delivery and organisation programme. Understanding and improving transitions of older people: a user and carer centred approach. 2012, London: The Stationery Office

    Google Scholar 

  33. Saldaña J: The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2009, London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lincoln YS: Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qual Inquiry. 1995, 1 (3): 275-289. 10.1177/107780049500100301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ British Med J. 2000, 320 (7226): 50-10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Seale C: Quality in qualitative research. Qual Inquiry. 1999, 5 (4): 465-478. 10.1177/107780049900500402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dingwall R, Murphy E, Watson P, Greatbatch D, Parker S: Catching goldfish: quality in qualitative research. J Health serv Res Policy. 1998, 3 (3): 167-172.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G: Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res. 1998, 8 (3): 341-351. 10.1177/104973239800800305.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J: Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2008, 1 (2): 13-22.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smith JA: Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2004, 1 (1): 39-54.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Polit DF, Beck CT: Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. Int J Nurs Studies. 2010, 47 (11): 1451-1458. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/13/117/prepub