What will happen if the CS is presented many times in the absence of the US group of answer choices?

Table of Contents

  • What is Spontaneous Recovery
  • Examples In Classical Conditioning
  • Examples In Operant Conditioning
  • How it Works

Spontaneous recovery refers to the sudden reappearance of a previously extinct conditioned response after the unconditioned stimulus has been removed for some time.

This phenomenon can occur after these two types of conditioning have taken place.

Classical conditioning – involuntary learning process through the association of neutral stimulus with a biologically potent stimulus that produces an unconditioned response.

Operant conditioning – voluntary learning through the use of reinforcement and punishment.

What will happen if the CS is presented many times in the absence of the US group of answer choices?

Spontaneous Recovery Examples – Classical Conditioning

In classical conditioning, also known as pavlovian conditioning, a previously neutral stimulus (NS) becomes conditioned when it is repeatedly paired with the unconditioned stimulus (US). This now conditioned stimulus (CS) can produce its own conditioned response (CR), which is usually very similar to the unconditioned response (UR).

However, some conditioned responses are vulnerable to extinction. If the conditioned stimulus continues to appear in the absence of the unconditioned stimulus, the conditioned response becomes weaker and weaker until it disappears, which is called the extinction procedure.

A famous example is Pavlov’s dogs. Ivan Pavlov, who coined the term pavlovian conditioning, experimented by sounding a bell repeatedly when he fed the dogs. Over time, they learned to associate the sound with food and salivated (a learned behavior) when they heard the sound. Then Pavlov started ringing the bell without giving food. Eventually, the dogs stopped salivating to the sound of the bell.

However, Pavlov noticed that even after a substantial amount of time had passed, the conditioned response would easily recover if the neutral stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus were paired again one day. Even though the dogs stopped salivating to the sound of the bell, their salivation recovered spontaneously after a “rest period.”​1​

Another example is that a child gets excited every day when they hear the ice cream truck music because their mother always buys them ice cream. When their mother stops buying, the child gradually learns to not associate the ice cream truck music with eating ice cream. After the truck stops coming for a few days and then returns, the child gets excited again when they hear the truck music.

Spontaneous Recovery Examples – Operant Conditioning

A trainer teaches a dog to sit by associating the command “Sit” with food. So the dog learns to sit whenever the trainer says the word. But after the trainer stops giving it food, the dog gradually stops responding to the command. Days later, the trainer tries again, and the dog sits again.

Here is another example. A child runs to the door to greet Dad because he always brings home a new toy. After Dad stops bringing home toys, the child stops running to the door to greet him. After a few days, the child suddenly resumes to greeting their Dad at the door.

For more help on calming tantrums, check out this step-by-step guide

What will happen if the CS is presented many times in the absence of the US group of answer choices?

Extinction involves inhibition.

The fact that conditioned response can suddenly recover suggests that extinction doesn’t erase the learned association. Instead, extinction inhibits the conditioned response. It appears that extinction forms new learning separate from the original conditioned learning​2​.

This new learning “extinguish” the conditioned response by inhibiting its expression instead of erasing or unlearning it. The conditioned response has not been forgotten or eliminated. Since the initial conditioned response never disappears, it eventually returns.

For example, studies show that, with sufficient time, sudden recovery of the fear response after extinction occurs 100% in situations such as fear conditioning​3​.

Recovery increases over time.

Over time, the inhibition from extinction fades and the spontaneous recovery gradually increases with time.

During the recovery, memory from the extinction process competes with the reactivated memory from initial conditioning but fails​5​.

Since new learning does not replace old ones, spontaneous recovery does not replace the extinction learning either. The recovery simply exists in the presence of extinction learning​4​.

Spontaneous recovery is incomplete

The strength of the recovered learning is usually smaller than the original learning. If extinction is applied again, the subsequent recovery will become weaker and weaker.

References

  1. 1.

  2. 2.

    Rescorla RA. Spontaneous Recovery. Learning & Memory. September 2004:501-509. doi:10.1101/lm.77504

  3. 3.

    Quirk GJ. Memory for Extinction of Conditioned Fear Is Long-lasting and Persists Following Spontaneous Recovery. Learning & Memory. November 2002:402-407. doi:10.1101/lm.49602

  4. 4.

    Bouton ME. Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biological Psychiatry. November 2002:976-986. doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01546-9

  5. 5.

    Laborda MA, Miller RR. Reactivated memories compete for expression after Pavlovian extinction. Behavioural Processes. May 2012:20-27. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2012.01.012

In the learning process known as classical conditioning, the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is one that unconditionally, naturally, and automatically triggers a response. In other words, the response takes place without any prior learning.

Contrast this with the condition stimulus. It only prompts a response after a person or animal has learned to associate the stimulus with a certain response.

Unconditioned stimuli are all around us. Think about:

  • The smell of a favorite food, which immediately makes you feel hungry
  • A feather tickling your nose, which causes you to sneeze
  • An onion's smell as you cut it, which makes your eyes water
  • Pollen from grass and flowers, which causes you to sneeze
  • A unexpected loud bang, which causes you to flinch

In each of these examples, the unconditioned stimulus naturally triggers an unconditioned response or reflex. You don't have to learn to respond to the unconditioned stimulus; it occurs automatically.

In Ivan Pavlov's classic experiment with dogs, Pavlov and his assistants showed the dogs edible and non-edible items and measured saliva production with each. Salivation occurred automatically and without the dogs' conscious effort when they smelled the food.

This response required no learning. The food was an unconditioned stimulus because it prompted a reflexive response.

Building on Pavlov's work, behaviorist John B. Watson and graduate student Rosalie Rayner conducted what came to be known as "the Little Albert experiment." The research showed that emotional reactions could be classically conditioned in people.

Watson and Rayner exposed a 9-month-old child, Albert, to a white rat, a rabbit, a monkey, masks, and burning newspapers and observed the boy's reactions. He showed no fear of them at first.

But after Watson began making a loud noise—an unconditioned stimulus that provoked Albert's crying—whenever he showed Albert the white rat, Albert became frightened whenever he saw the white rat. Because he'd learned to associate the white rat with a noise he feared, he ultimately reacted with fear to the rat as well. The rat, once a neutral stimulus, had become a conditioned stimulus.

For the purposes of classical conditioning or learning, you need a neutral stimulus as well as an unconditioned stimulus. In other words, for conditioning to take place, you must first start by pairing a neutral stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus.

A neutral stimulus doesn't trigger any particular response at first, but when used together with an unconditioned stimulus, it can effectively stimulate learning, eventually becoming a conditioned stimulus. A good example of a neutral stimulus is a sound or a song.

When it is initially presented, the neutral stimulus has no effect on behavior. As it is repeatedly paired with an unconditioned stimulus, it will begin to cause the same response as the UCS.

For example, the assistants in Pavlov's experiment initially elicited no salivation and therefore were neutral stimuli. Likewise, the sound of a squeaky door opening is initially a neutral stimulus. If that sound is repeatedly paired with an unconditioned stimulus, such as feeding your cat, that sound will eventually come to trigger a change in your cat's behavior. Once an association has been formed, your cat may react as if it is being fed every time it hears the squeaky door open.

An unconditioned stimulus causes a response without any prior learning on the part of the subject. The response is automatic and occurs without thought. In contrast, a conditioned stimulus produces a reaction only after the subject has learned to associate it with a given outcome.

In Pavlov's experiments, the dogs learned to salivate when they saw the assistants' white lab coats because they'd formed an association between the assistants and the food they presented, The salivary response to the assistants was not an automatic, physiological process, but a learned one. The presence of the assistants, initially a neutral stimulus, became a conditioned stimulus.

Throughout the classical conditioning process, a number of factors can influence how quickly associations are learned. The length of time that passes between presenting the initially neutral stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus is one of the most important factors in whether learning occurs.

The timing of how the neutral stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus are presented is what influences whether or not an association will be formed, a principle that is known as the theory of contiguity.

In Pavlov's experiment, the sound of a buzzer was initially a neutral stimulus, while the smell of food was an unconditioned stimulus. Presenting the tone close to presenting the smell of food resulted in a stronger association. Ringing the buzzer, the neutral stimulus, long before the unconditioned stimulus led to a much weaker or even nonexistent association.

Different types of conditioning may use different timing or order between the neutral stimulus and the UCS.

  • In simultaneous conditioning, the neutral stimulus is presented at the exact time as the unconditioned stimulus. This type of conditioning leads to weak learning.
  • In backward conditioning, the unconditioned stimulus is given first, and the neutral stimulus is presented afterward. This type of conditioning also tends to result in weak learning.
  • In trace conditioning, the neutral stimulus is presented briefly and then stopped, then the unconditioned stimulus is presented. This type of conditioning produces good results.
  • In delayed conditioning, the neutral stimulus is presented and continues while the unconditioned stimulus is offered. This type of conditioning produces the best results.