What is quasi-experimental in your own words?

1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Raven Publishers, 1998.

2. Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Epidemiology in medicine. Boston: Little, Brown, 1987.

3. Szklo M, Nieto FJ. Epidemiology: beyond the basics. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers, 2000.

4. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.

5. Trochim WMK. The research methods knowledge base. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog Publishing, 2001.

6. Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally Publishing Company, 1979.

7. MacLehose RR, Reeves BC, Harvey IM, Sheldon TA, Russell IT, Black AM. A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4:1–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Shadish WR, Heinsman DT. Experiments versus quasi-experiments: do they yield the same answer? NIDA Res Monogr. 1997;170:147–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Grimshaw J, Campbell M, Eccles M, Steen N. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies. Fam Pract. 2000;17(Suppl 1):S11–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Zwerling C, Daltroy LH, Fine LJ, Johnston JJ, Melius J, Silverstein BA. Design and conduct of occupational injury intervention studies: a review of evaluation strategies. Am J Ind Med. 1997;32:164–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Haux RKC, editor. Yearbook of medical informatics 2005. Stuttgart: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft, 2005, 563.

12. Morton V, Torgerson DJ. Effect of regression to the mean on decision making in health care. BMJ. 2003;326:1083–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Regression towards the mean. BMJ. 1994;308:1499. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Some examples of regression towards the mean. BMJ. 1994;309:780. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, Cook DJ, Green L, Naylor CD, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users' guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 2000;284:1290–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, Lohr KN, Mulrow CD, Teutsch SM, et al. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20:21–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ. 2001;323:334–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Wagner AK, Soumerai SB, Zhang F, Ross-Degnan D. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2002;27:299–309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Campbell DT. Counterbalanced design. In: Company RMCP, editor. Experimental and Quasiexperimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand-McNally College Publishing Company, 1963, 50–5.

20. Staggers N, Kobus D. Comparing response time, errors, and satisfaction between text-based and graphical user interfaces during nursing order tasks. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:164–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Schriger DL, Baraff LJ, Buller K, Shendrikar MA, Nagda S, Lin EJ, et al. Implementation of clinical guidelines via a computer charting system: effect on the care of febrile children less than three years of age. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:186–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Patel VL, Kushniruk AW, Yang S, Yale JF. Impact of a computer-based patient record system on data collection, knowledge organization, and reasoning. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:569–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Borowitz SM. Computer-based speech recognition as an alternative to medical transcription. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:101–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Patterson R, Harasym P. Educational instruction on a hospital information system for medical students during their surgical rotations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:111–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Rocha BH, Christenson JC, Evans RS, Gardner RM. Clinicians' response to computerized detection of infections. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:117–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Lovis C, Chapko MK, Martin DP, Payne TH, Baud RH, Hoey PJ, et al. Evaluation of a command-line parser-based order entry pathway for the Department of Veterans Affairs electronic patient record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:486–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Hersh WR, Junium K, Mailhot M, Tidmarsh P. Implementation and evaluation of a medical informatics distance education program. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:570–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Makoul G, Curry RH, Tang PC. The use of electronic medical records: communication patterns in outpatient encounters. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:610–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Ruland CM. Handheld technology to improve patient care: evaluating a support system for preference-based care planning at the bedside. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:192–201. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. De Lusignan S, Stephens PN, Adal N, Majeed A. Does feedback improve the quality of computerized medical records in primary care? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:395–401. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Mekhjian HS, Kumar RR, Kuehn L, Bentley TD, Teater P, Thomas A, et al. Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:529–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C, Eichstadter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:69–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Oniki TA, Clemmer TP, Pryor TA. The effect of computer-generated reminders on charting deficiencies in the ICU. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:177–87. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Liederman EM, Morefield CS. Web messaging: a new tool for patient-physician communication. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:260–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Rotich JK, Hannan TJ, Smith FE, Bii J, Odero WW, Vu N, Mamlin BW, et al. Installing and implementing a computer-based patient record system in sub-Saharan Africa: the Mosoriot Medical Record System. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:295–303. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Payne TH, Hoey PJ, Nichol P, Lovis C. Preparation and use of preconstructed orders, order sets, and order menus in a computerized provider order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:322–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

37. Hoch I, Heymann AD, Kurman I, Valinsky LJ, Chodick G, Shalev V. Countrywide computer alerts to community physicians improve potassium testing in patients receiving diuretics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:541–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Laerum H, Karlsen TH, Faxvaag A. Effects of scanning and eliminating paper-based medical records on hospital physicians' clinical work practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:588–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

39. Devine EG, Gaehde SA, Curtis AC. Comparative evaluation of three continuous speech recognition software packages in the generation of medical reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:462–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

40. Dunbar PJ, Madigan D, Grohskopf LA, Revere D, Woodward J, Minstrell J, et al. A two-way messaging system to enhance antiretroviral adherence. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:11–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

41. Lenert L, Munoz RF, Stoddard J, Delucchi K, Bansod A, Skoczen S, et al. Design and pilot evaluation of an Internet smoking cessation program. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:16–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

42. Koide D, Ohe K, Ross-Degnan D, Kaihara S. Computerized reminders to monitor liver function to improve the use of etretinate. Int J Med Inf. 2000;57:11–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

43. Gonzalez-Heydrich J, DeMaso DR, Irwin C, Steingard RJ, Kohane IS, Beardslee WR. Implementation of an electronic medical record system in a pediatric psychopharmacology program. Int J Med Inf. 2000;57:109–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

44. Anantharaman V, Swee Han L. Hospital and emergency ambulance link: using IT to enhance emergency pre-hospital care. Int J Med Inf. 2001;61:147–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

45. Chae YM, Heon Lee J, Hee Ho S, Ja Kim H, Hong Jun K, Uk Won J. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in home health services for the elderly. Int J Med Inf. 2001;61:167–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

46. Lin CC, Chen HS, Chen CY, Hou SM. Implementation and evaluation of a multifunctional telemedicine system in NTUH. Int J Med Inf. 2001;61:175–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

47. Mikulich VJ, Liu YC, Steinfeldt J, Schriger DL. Implementation of clinical guidelines through an electronic medical record: physician usage, satisfaction and assessment. Int J Med Inf. 2001;63:169–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

48. Hwang JI, Park HA, Bakken S. Impact of a physician's order entry (POE) system on physicians' ordering patterns and patient length of stay. Int J Med Inf. 2002;65:213–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

49. Park WS, Kim JS, Chae YM, Yu SH, Kim CY, Kim SA, et al. Does the physician order-entry system increase the revenue of a general hospital? Int J Med Inf. 2003;71:25–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


Page 2

Threats to Internal Validity

1. Ambiguous temporal precedence: Lack of clarity about whether intervention occurred before outcome
2. Selection: Systematic differences over conditions in respondent characteristics that could also cause the observed effect
3. History: Events occurring concurrently with intervention could cause the observed effect
4. Maturation: Naturally occurring changes over time could be confused with a treatment effect
5. Regression: When units are selected for their extreme scores, they will often have less extreme subsequent scores, an occurrence that can be confused with an intervention effect
6. Attrition: Loss of respondents can produce artifactual effects if that loss is correlated with intervention
7. Testing: Exposure to a test can affect scores on subsequent exposures to that test
8. Instrumentation: The nature of a measurement may change over time or conditions
9. Interactive effects: The impact of an intervention may depend on the level of another intervention