Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:

Definition: Departmentalization or Departmentation is a process wherein jobs/teams are combined together into functional units called as departments on the basis of their area of specialization, to achieve the goals of the organisation. So, in this way, the entire organization is divided into parts, i.e. departments which comprise of a group of employees, who carry out activities of similar nature.

It determines the functions/activities which are to be housed together and coordinated at the same place. Further, it groups the personnel, who will undertake the delegated functions/tasks.

In a corporate ladder, every level below the top is departmentalized, and each subsequent level is further differentiated into departments.

The top-level executives, groups activities in various departments, such as production, marketing, finance, human resource, research and development, etc. These departments are headed by senior executives, called as managers of the respective department. The departmental managers can delegate tasks and duties to the subordinates, and they are accountable to the chief executive for the performance of the department.

Objectives of Departmentalization

  • To specialize activities.
  • To simplify the process and operations of the organization
  • To maintain control

Departmentalization of activities results in the increase in efficiency of the management and ultimately the enterprise. It is helpful in fixing responsibilities and accountability.

Methods of Departmentalization

  1. Departmentalization by Function: When the creation of department is on the basis of specified functions, such as production, marketing, purchase, finance etc. In this method, all the activities related to a function or which are of similar nature are combined in a single unit, to give proper directions to the entire group in one go.
    Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:
  2. Departmentalization by Process: In departmentation by the process, the activities are grouped as per the production processes. These departments require manpower and material so as to carryout operations.
    Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:
  3. Departmentalization by Product: When the activities related to product development and delivery are combined into a particular division, it is called as product departmentalization. It is appropriate for large-scale multi-product enterprises.
    Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:
  4. Departmentalization by Customer: The grouping of the organization according to the different classes of customer or clients. It focuses on special customer needs.
    Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:
  5. Departmentalization by Territory: When the division is based on the geographical area, it is called as territorial departmentalization. This is suitable for the organizations, that have widespread operations at different locations.
  6. Departmentalization by Project: In project departmentalization, the organizational activities are classified by differentiated or special ventures or activities.

The choice of departmentalization basis is influenced by the factors such as the degree of specialization, coordination, control, cost consideration, adequate attention to key areas, etc.

Learning for "What are organisational structure?"

Some starting thoughts:

When two or more people come together; to work to achieve a common purpose or to achieve objectives, we have the basis of an organization.  Often, the next step is to establish what must be done and by whom – such as functions to be performed, where these will take place, people involved etc all of which leads to thinking about how the organization will be structured and how it will operate.

A Definition

Organizational structure refers to the formal definition of tasks, jobs, work units, people, and resources in a business/organization and the relationships between these.

What is Organizational Structure? Why is it Important?

Departmentalization

Grouping related functions into manageable units to achieve the objectives of the enterprise in the most efficient and effective manner is traditionally referred to as departmentalization.  The primary forms of departmentalization are by function, process, product, market, customer, geographic area, and sometimes matrix (also called project organization). In many organizations, a combination of these forms is used.

Structure shapes the effectiveness of an organization in terms of inter-departmental working relationships, product and service development lead times, quality, efficiency, and responsiveness to customer demands. It also influences individual employee and working team morale, motivation, commitment, and satisfaction.

Different Types of Organizational Structures

By Function

Perhaps the oldest and most common method of grouping related functions is by specialized function, such as marketing, finance, and production (or operations). Sometimes this form of departmentalization may create problems if individuals with specialized functions become more concerned with their own specialized area than with the overall business.

Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:

By Process

Departmentalization can also take place by process. This type of structure is often found in large process or manufacturing companies,

Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:

By Product

Whenever specialized knowledge of certain products or services is needed, departmentalisation by product may be observed. This usually occurs in large diversified companies.

Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:

By Market

When a need exists to provide better service to different types of markets, departmentalisation by market may be the appropriate form. Below is an example of a business serving non-profit markets, which uses the market form of departmentalisation,

Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:

By Customer

Sometimes key or major customers warrant departmentalisation by customers or groups of type of customers. This is often the case in banks, financial institutions or service industries such as marketing, advertising and insurance.

Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:

By Geographic location

When organizations are spread throughout the world or have territories in many parts of a country, departmentalisation by geographic area may provide better service to customers and be more cost effective.

Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:

Combination of Organization Structures

Divisional

In reality, organizations of any size may employ multiple types of structure using various combinations of the elements covered on the previous slides.

Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:

Multiple

Many organizations, particularly large, physically dispersed and diversified organizations, utilize several different forms of departmentalization.

Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:

Matrix

Departmentalization by matrix, or project, has received considerable use in recent years, particularly in such industries as aerospace (e.g., NASA). Staff with different backgrounds and experiences appropriate to the project are assembled and given the specific project to be accomplished within a certain time period.

Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:

Other Aspects of Organizational Structure

A note on Centralization v decentralization

Centralization and decentralization involve the principle of delegation of authority. When a limited amount of authority is delegated in an organization, it is usually characterized as centralized. When a significant amount of authority is delegated to lower levels in the organization, the business is characterized as decentralized. Centralization and decentralization are opposites, and there are different degrees of each. In a highly centralized organization, employees at lower levels have a limited range of decision-making authority. The scope of authority to make decisions in decentralized organizations, by way of contrast, is very broad for lower level employees.

Departmentalization by function is the grouping together of:

Emerging Organisational Structures

Each new generation of technology creates new opportunities to redesign or

rethink organizational structure. The acceleration of change requires flexible structures that can rapidly incorporate and adapt to technological and process changes.

Whilst backbone structures (such as the ones we have looked at in this document) focused on strategic management as well as provision of administrative and support functions will still exist; there will be a growing use of informal structures (task oriented), to include project teams (actual and virtual), matrix structures, collaboration networks, and others that work within and across the organizational hierarchy.

Technology fulfills the communication and coordination functions that once were accomplished through a formal chain of command. Organizations are no longer limited to one design presumed to be right for all circumstances. They can adopt whatever informal structures are needed to meet current operations and dismantle them when the requirements change. This enables large organizations to act like small ones in dealing with change. They do not have to overhaul a large infrastructure. Using informal structures, they can experiment and adapt on a small scale before making large resource commitments; they can also redirect personnel quickly and avoid the cost of overall restructuring.

Virtual Organization (Food for thought)

Organic or Open Organization

The usual goals for organizations are high productivity and efficiency.  Organizations are seen as reliable machines and employees are considered to be sub-machines or constituent parts of the machine.  This type of organization requires stable environment in which it operates and it is not subjected to rapid change and development.  The emergence of globalization and the high connectivity through telecommunication channels has on the one hand provided the firms with opportunity in the shape of new markets.  On the other hand, this also has its adverse consequences in that it encourages the threat of substitute products and services, usually from small and medium sized firms, operating in manufacturing and service industries and communities at much reduced costs.  The environment therefore becomes turbulent and subject to rapid change.  Well documented and established rules, stringent policies and procedures for business processes and manufacturing regimes become hurdles that undermine the ability of organization to adapt to the changes in the environment quickly and effectively.

Organic organization philosophy promotes the encouragement of creativity of individuals.  It is based on the hypothesis that productivity and adaptability to rapid change is increased when employees are placed at the centre of their environment and they are allowed to manage themselves and their resources.  When their creativity is accounted for and rewarded.  When their continuous development is encouraged through provision of opportunities and resources. 

This type of system or organization allows for the de-centralization of jobs.  Formal procedures are de-emphasized.

Modular Organization

Modularity in organization changes the traditional hierarchical structure to form loosely coupled networks of organizational actors. The underlying idea is that these loosely coupled actors or objects would quite easily form and reform organizational components that are loosely coupled.

The idea of modularity in organizational structure goes hand in hand with idea of modularity in software development.  One of the software engineering goals for software design is that we should design software applications in a highly modular fashion.  Computing applications should be made of components that are highly modular.  That is each components should do one thing and one thing only.  For example in a Human Resource Management application a component may be responsible for creating Wage Slips.  This is a tangible and of value business process and outcome.  The same component should not also manage employee schedule.  It should be modular.  Furthermore, software components should be loosely coupled. That is if we change the internal structure or implementation of one of the components, this does not adversely affect the performance or functionality of other components that it interacts with.  In other words these components should be loosely coupled.  In building systems we endeavor to build solutions made up of components that are highly modular and loosely coupled.

These are organizations where non-core functions are likely to be sub-contracted or outsourced.  This is a direct effect of the use of technology and telecommunication channels for doing business.  Using affordable technology and connectivity, companies can maintain relationships with business partners at lower costs than ever before.  This also has an impact on the product in that such organizations tend to build products or services that are highly modular.  These organizations concentrate on their core capabilities and build alliances and joint ventures. 

In summary

Other Aspects of Organizational Structure - A note on centralization v decentralization

Characteristics of Decentralized Structures

  • Features of High Decentralization (Flatter Organizations)
  • Eliminates layers of management
    • Decisions can be made by people closer to the problem
  • Faster decision-making without resort to higher level consultation
    • Excellent training experience for promotion to higher level management
    • Decisions better adapted to local conditions
  • Features of Low Decentralization (Taller Organizations)
  • Eliminates additional responsibility not desired by some people performing routine jobs
    • Permits crucial decisions to be made by individuals with the big picture
  • Closer control of operations
    • Uniformity of policies, practices, and procedures
  • Better use of centralized, specialized experts

Some emerging trends are significant

  • Increasing pace of technology change and development
  • Increasing impact of technology on organizational structures
  • Employees and Customers technology/computer literate

·        Business areas/functions are increasingly accountable for the value they create for the customer.

·        Business boundaries are blurring as electronic networks tie business partners, suppliers and customers more closely together.

·        Activities are becoming more distributed, business wide (and sometimes worldwide).

·        The size and importance of premises such as centralized business headquarters is decreasing.

Acknowledgements

Classifications and some diagrams in this document are derived from:

Montana, P. and Charnov, B. Management: A Streamlined Course for Students and Business People. (Hauppauge, New York: Barron’s Business Review Series, 1993), pp. 155-169.