When an observer takes into account the context or circumstances surrounding what someone does to if it is psychopathological It means that?

1. Emminghaus H. Allgemeine Psychopathologie zur Einführung in das Studium der Geistesstörungen. Leipzig: F.C.W. Vogel; (1878). 492. [Google Scholar]

2. Jaspers K. Allgemeine Psychopathologie. Ein Leitfaden für Studierende, Ärzte und Psychologen. Berlin: Springer; (1913). 338. [Google Scholar]

3. Berrios GE. Phenomenology and psychopathology: was there ever a relationshhip? Compr Psychiatry (1993) 34:213–20. 10.1016/0010-440X(93)90001-K [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Beumont PJ. Phenomenology and the history of psychiatry. Aust N Z J Psychiatry (1992) 26:532–45. 10.3109/00048679209072085 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Parnas J, Sass LA, Zahavi D. Rediscovering psychopathology: the epistemology and phenomenology of the psychiatric object. Schizophr Bull. (2012) 39:270–7. 10.1093/schbul/sbs153 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Heckers S. Future in psychopathology research. Schizophr Bull. (2014) 40(Suppl. 2):S147–51. 10.1093/schbul/sbt159 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Huber G. The psychopathology of K. Jaspers and K. Schneider as a fundamental method for psychiatry. World J Biol Psychiatry (2002) 3:50–7. 10.3109/15622970209150601 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Musalek M, Larach-Walters V, Lepine JP, Millet B, Gaebel W, on behalf of the WSFSBP Task Force on Nosology and Psychopathology . Psychopathology in the 21st century. World J Biol Psychiatry (2010) 11:844–51. 10.3109/15622975.2010.510207 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Stanghelli G. The meanings of psychopathology. Curr Opin Psychiatry (2009) 22:559–64. 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283318e36 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Stanghelli G, Broome MR. Psychopathology as the basic science of psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry (2014) 205:169–70. 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.138974 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Torres-Correia D, Sampaio D. Historical roots of psychopathology. Front Psychol. (2016) 7:905 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00905 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Andreasen NC. DSM and the death of phenomenology in America: an example of unintended consequences. Schizophr Bull. (2006) 33:108–12. 10.1093/schbul/sbl054 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Schultze-Lutter F, Schimmelmann BG, Ruhrmann S. The near Babylonian speech confusion in early detection of psychosis. Schizophr Bull. (2011) 37:653–5. 10.1093/schbul/sbr039 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J, Gaebel W, Schmidt SJ. Psychosis-risk criteria in the general population: frequent misinterpretations and current evidence. World Psychiatry (2018) 17:109–10. 10.1002/wps.20498 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. van Os J, Guloksuz S. A critique of the “ultra-high risk” and “transition” paradigm. World Psychiatry (2017) 16:200–6. 10.1002/wps.20423 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Schultze-Lutter F, Renner F, Paruch J, Julkowski D, Klosterkötter J, Ruhrmann S. Self-reported psychotic-like experiences are a poor estimate of clinician-rated attenuated and frank delusions and hallucination. Psychopathology (2014) 47:194–201. 10.1159/000355554 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Linscott RJ, van Os J. An updated and conservative systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence on psychotic experiences in children and adults: on the pathway from proneness to persistence to dimensional expression across mental disorders. Psychol Med. (2013) 43:1133–49. 10.1017/S0033291712001626 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Spitz A, Studerus E, Koranyi S, Rapp C, Ramyead A, Ittig S, et al. Correlations between self-rating and observer-rating od psychopathology in at-risk mental state and first-episode psychosis patients: influence of disease stage and gender. Early Interv Psychiatry (2017) 11:461–70. 10.1111/eip.12270 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

19. Huber G. Reine defektsyndrome und basisstadien endogener psychose. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. (1966) 34:409–26. [Google Scholar]

20. Schultze-Lutter F. Subjective symptoms of schizophrenia in research and the clinic: the basic symptom concept. Schizophr Bull. (2009) 35:5–8. 10.1093/schbul/sbn139 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Schultze-Lutter F, Debbané M, Theodoridou A, Wood SJ, Raballo A, Michel C, et al. Revisiting the basic symptom concept: towards translating risk symptoms for psychosis into neurobiological targets. Front Psychiatry (2016) 7:9 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00009 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Schultze-Lutter F, Theodoridou A. The concept of basic symptoms: its relevance in research and the clinic. World Psychiatry (2017) 16:104–5. 10.1002/wps.20404 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Schultze-Lutter F, Ruhrmann S, Fusar-Poli P, Bechdolf A, Schimmelmann BG, Klosterkötter J. Basic symptoms and the prediction of first-episode psychosis. Curr Pharm Des. (2012) 18:351–7. 10.2174/138161212799316064 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Parnas J, Raballo A, Handest P, Jansson L, Vollmer-Larsen A, Sæbye D. Self-experience in the early phases of schizophrenia: 5-year follow-up of the Copenhagen Prodromal Study. World Psychiatry (2011) 10:200–4. 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00057.x [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Parnas J, Møller P, Kircher T, Thalbitzer J, Jansson L, Handest P, et al. EASE: Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience. Psychopathology (2005) 38:236–58. 10.1159/000088441 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Sass L, Pienkos E, Skodlar B, Stanghellini G, Fuchs T, Parnas J, et al. EAWE: Examination of Anomalous World Experience. Psychopathology (2017) 50:10–54. 10.1159/000454928 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. American Psychiatric Association (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed (DSM-5) Arlington, VA: APA; (2013). 991. [Google Scholar]

28. Schultze-Lutter F, Addington J, Ruhrmann S, Klosterkötter J. Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument, Adult Version (SPI-A). Rome: Giovanni Fioriti Editore s.r.l; (2007). 97. [Google Scholar]

29. Schultze-Lutter F, Marshall M, Koch E. Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument, Child and Youth Version; Extended English Translation (SPI-CY EET). Rome: Giovanni Fioriti Editore s.r.l; (2012). 167. [Google Scholar]

30. Huber G. Psychopathologie – eine versiegende Quelle? Ein kritischer Kommentar. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. (2002) 70:393–402. 10.1055/s-2002-33058 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Cuthbert BN. Translating intermediate phenotypes into psychopathology: the NIMH research domain criteria. Psychophysiology (2014) 51:1205–6. 10.1111/psyp.12342 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

32. Brainstorm Consortium, Anttila V, Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Walters RK, Bras J, et al. Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science (2018) 360:eaap8757. 10.1126/science.aap8757 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Pasternak O, Kelly S, Sydnor VJ, Shenton ME. Advances in microstructural diffusion neuroimaging for psychiatric disorders. Neuroimage (2018). [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.051 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Power BD, Nguyen T, Hayhow B, Looi J. Neuroimaging in psychiatry: an update on neuroimaging in the clinical setting. Australas Psychiatry (2016) 24:157–63. 10.1177/1039856215618525 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

35. Schultze-Lutter F, Michel C, Ruhrmann S, Schimmelmann BG. Prevalence and clinical relevance of interview-assessed psychosis risk symptoms in the young adult community. Psychol Med. (2018) 48:1167–78. 10.1017/S0033291717002586 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. Schultze-Lutter F, Ruhrmann S, Schimmelmann BG, Michel C. ‘A rose is a rose is a rose’, but at-risk criteria differ. Psychopathology (2013) 46:75–87. 10.1159/000339208 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Schultze-Lutter F, Hubl D, Schimmelmann BG, Michel C. Age effect on prevalence of ultra-high risk for psychosis symptoms: replication in a clinical sample of an early detection of psychosis service. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2017) 26:1401–5. 10.1007/s00787-017-0994-y [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

38. Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D, Achenbach TM, Althoff RR, Bagby RM, et al.. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): a dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. J Abnorm Psychol. (2017) 126:454–77. 10.1037/abn0000258 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

39. Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D. A paradigm shift in psychiatric classification: the Hierarchical Taxonomy Of Psychopathology (HiTOP). World Psychiatry (2018) 17:24–5. 10.1002/wps.20478 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

40. Eisener E, Drake R, Lobban F, Bucci S, Emsley R, Barrowclough C. Comparing early signs and basic symptoms as methods for predicting psychotic relapse in clinical practice. Schizophr Res. (2018) 192:124–30. 10.1016/j.schres.2017.04.050 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

41. Basili R, Bellomaria V, Bugge NJ, Croce D, De Michele F, Federico FN, et al. Monitoring adolescents' distress using social web data as a Source: the insideout project. In: Basili R, Nissim M, Satta G. editors. Proceedings of the Fourth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2017. Torino: Academia University Press; (2017), 24–9. [Google Scholar]

42. Howes C, Purver M, McCabe R. Linguistic indicators of severity and progress in online text-based therapy for depression. In: Association for Computational Linguistics editor. ACL Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality. Baltimore, MA: Association for Computational Linguistics; (2014). 7–16. [Google Scholar]

43. McManus K, Mallory EK, Goldfeder RL, Haynes WA, Tatum JD. Mining Twitter Data to improve detection of schizophrenia. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. (2015) 2015:122–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

44. Park M, McDonald DW, Cha M. Perception differences between the depressed and non-depressed users in twitter. In: Kiciman E, Ellison NB, Hogan B, Resnick P, Soboroff I. editors. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Cambridge, MA: AAAAI Press; (2013). 476–85. [Google Scholar]

45. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep Learning. Vol. 1 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; (2016). 864. [Google Scholar]

46. Koutsouleris N, Kambeitz-Ilankovic L, Ruhrmann S, Rosen M, Ruef A, Dwyer DB, et al. Individualized prediction of functional outcomes in mental healthcare: a multi-modal, multi-site machine learning analysis in the clinical high-risk state for psychosis and recent-onset depression. JAMA Psychiatry (2018). [Google Scholar]

47. Borsboom D, Cramer AO, Schmittmann VD, Epskamp S, Waldorp LJ. The small world of psychopathology. PLoS ONE (2011) 6:e27407. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027407 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

48. Nelson B, McGorry PD, Wichers M, Wigman JTW, Hartmann JA. Moving from static to dynamic models of the onset of mental disorder: a review. JAMA Psychiatry (2017) 74:528–34. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0001 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

49. Goldberg D. Psychopathology and classification in psychiatry. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2015) 50:1–5. 10.1007/s00127-014-0924-y [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]