What is a subset of sustainable MIS refers to the environmentally responsible use manufacture and disposal of technology products and computer equipment?

• View PDF

Volume 63, April 2022, 102456

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456Get rights and content

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

1. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS) 2016 uRL: http://www.eia.gov/consumption/manufacturing/

2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 2017 uRL: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-03/documents/industrial-waste-guide.pdf.

3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guide for Industrial Waste Management. 2017 uRL: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions.

4. Meckstroth DJ. The Manufacturing Value Chain Is Much Bigger Than You Think! MAPI Foundation; Arlington: [Google Scholar]

5. Thomas D, Kandaswamy A, Kneifel J. Identifying High Resource Consumption Supply Chain Points: A Case Study in Automobile Production. Technology. 2010;35:283–333. [Google Scholar]

6. Energy Star Program. Industrial energy management. 2016 uRL: https://www.energystar.gov/buildings/facility-owners-and-managers/industrial-plants.

7. Cruz F. GM has saved $435 million in reduced energy costs through 20 years. 2015 uRL: http://gmauthority.com/blog/2015/11/gm-has-saved-435-million-in-reduced-energy-costs-through-20-years/

8. General Motors Inc. National Energy Month spurs action at GM. 2015 uRL: http://media.gm.com/media/us/en/gm/news.detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en/2015/oct/1027-energy.html.

9. Suh S. Reply: Downstream cut-offs in integrated hybrid life-cycle assessment. Ecological Economics. 2006;59(1):7–12. [Google Scholar]

10. Löfgren B, Tillman AM, Rinde B. Manufacturing actors LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2011;19(17):2025–2033. [Google Scholar]

11. ISO 14001. Environmental management systems Requirements with guidance for use. International Organization for Standardization; 2015. [Google Scholar]

12. Baumann H, Berlin J, Brunklaus B, Lindkvist M, Löfgren B, Tillman AM. The usefulness of an actors perspective in LCA, in. Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management, Springer. 2011:73–83. [Google Scholar]

13. Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment-Part I goals and scope and inventory analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2008;13(4):290–300. [Google Scholar]

14. Ullman DG. The mechanical design process. Vol. 2. McGraw-Hill; New York: 1992. [Google Scholar]

15. Ramani K, Ramanujan D, Bernstein WZ, Zhao F, Sutherland J, Handwerker C, Choi JK, Kim H, Thurston D. Integrated sustainable life cycle design: a review. Journal of Mechanical Design. 2010;132(9):091004. [Google Scholar]

16. Hedberg T, Lubell J, Fischer L, Maggiano L, Feeney AB. Testing the Digital Thread in Support of Model-Based Manufacturing and Inspection. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. 2016;16(2) 021001–021001–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Bhanot N, Rao PV, Deshmukh S. An integrated approach for analysing the enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production [Google Scholar]

18. Finkbeiner M, Inaba A, Tan R, Christiansen K, Klüppel HJ. The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. The international journal of life cycle assessment. 2006;11(2):80–85. [Google Scholar]

19. Meinshausen I, Müller-Beilschmidt P, Viere T. The EcoSpold 2 formatwhy a new format? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2014:1–5. [Google Scholar]

20. ASTM E2986-15. Standard Guide for Evaluation of Environmental Aspects of Sustainability of Manufacturing Processes. ASTM International; 2015. [Google Scholar]

21. ASTM E3012-16. Standard Guide for Characterizing Environmental Aspects of Manufacturing Processes. ASTM International; 2016. [Google Scholar]

22. ASTM 3096-17. New guide for definition, selection, and composition of key performance indicators for environmental aspects of manufacturing processes. ASTM International; 2017. [Google Scholar]

23. Bernstein WZ, Mani M, Lyons KW, Morris K, Johansson B. An Open web-based repository for capturing manufacturing process information. ASME 2016 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 2016 V004T05A028. [Google Scholar]

24. ISO 20140. Automation systems and integration - Environmental and energy efficiency evaluation method for manufacturing systems. International Organization for Standardization; 2013. [Google Scholar]

25. ISO 10303-1:1994. Industrial automation systems and integration – Product data representation and exchange – Part 1: Overview and fundamental principles. ISO; 1994. [Google Scholar]

26. Haapala KR, Zhao F, Camelio J, Sutherland JW, Skerlos SJ, Dornfeld DA, Jawahir I, Clarens AF, Rickli JL. A review of engineering research in sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2013;135(4):041013. [Google Scholar]

27. Duflou JR, Sutherland JW, Dornfeld D, Herrmann C, Jeswiet J, Kara S, Hauschild M, Kel-lens K. Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: A processes and systems approach. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology. 2012;61(2):587–609. [Google Scholar]

28. Byggeth S, Hochschorner E. Handling trade-offs in ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2006;14(15):1420–1430. [Google Scholar]

29. Rossi M, Germani M, Zamagni A. Review of ecodesign methods and tools: Barriers and strategies for an effective implementation in industrial companies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;129:361–373. [Google Scholar]

30. Bovea M, Pérez-Belis V. A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2012;20(1):61–71. [Google Scholar]

31. Barkmeyer EJ, Christopher N, Feng SC, Fowler JE, Frechette SP, Jones A, Jurrens K, Lyons K, Mclean CR, Pratt M, et al. SIMA Reference Architecture, Part 1: Activity Models, National Institute of Standards and Technology. 1996 [Google Scholar]

32. Bernstein WZ, Ramanujan D, Devanathan S, Zhao F, Sutherland J, Ramani K. ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2010. Function impact matrix for sustainable concept generation: a designers perspective; pp. 377–383. [Google Scholar]

33. Ross S, Evans D, Webber M. How LCA studies deal with uncertainty. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2002;7(1):47. [Google Scholar]

34. Kuczenski B, Davis CB, Rivela B, Janowicz K. Semantic catalogs for life cycle assessment data. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;137:1109–1117. [Google Scholar]

35. Hankel M, Rexroth B. The Reference Architectural Model Industrie 4.0 (RAMI 4.0), ZVEI, April [Google Scholar]

36. Valivullah L, Mani M, Lyons KW, Gupta S. ASME 2014 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference collocated with the JSME 2014 International Conference on Materials and Processing and the 42nd North American Manufacturing Research Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2014. Manufacturing Process Information Models for Sustainable Manufacturing. V001T05A005–V001T05A005. [Google Scholar]

37. Ramanujan D, Bernstein WZ, Benjamin W, Ramani K, Elmqvist N, Kulkarni D, Tew J. A Framework for Visualization-Driven Eco-Conscious Design Exploration. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. 2015;15(4):041010. [Google Scholar]

38. Brezet H. Ecodesign, a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption, United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) [Google Scholar]

39. Hochschorner E, Finnveden G. Evaluation of two simplified life cycle assessment methods. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2003;8(3):119–128. [Google Scholar]

40. Johnson EF, Gay A. A practical, customer-oriented DFE methodology. Electronics and the Environment, 1995, ISEE, Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on, IEEE. 1995:47–50. [Google Scholar]

41. Abramovici M, Quezada A, Schindler T. Methodical Approach for Rough Energy Assessment and Compliance Checking of Energy-related Product Design Options. Procedia CIRP. 2014;21:421–426. [Google Scholar]

42. Jayal A, Badurdeen F, Dillon O, Jawahir I. Sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology. 2010;2(3):144–152. [Google Scholar]

43. Poli C. Design for manufacturing: a structured approach. Vol. 1. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2001. [Google Scholar]

44. Vinodh S, Rajanayagam D. CAD and DFM: enablers of sustainable product design. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. 2010;3(4):292–298. [Google Scholar]

45. Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight WA. Product design for manufacture and assembly, CRC press. 2010 [Google Scholar]

46. Kuo TC, Huang SH, Zhang HC. Design for manufacture and design for X: concepts, applications, and perspectives. Computers & industrial engineering. 2001;41(3):241–260. [Google Scholar]

47. Fabricius F. Design for Manufacture, DFM: Guide for Improving the Manufacturability of Industrial Products, Institute for Product Development, Technical University of Denmark. 2003 [Google Scholar]

48. Herbertsson J. Product Structuring in Design for Manufacture. Notes on the WDK Workshop on Product Structuring at TU-Delft, June 22-23. 1995:1–11. [Google Scholar]

49. PRé Sustainability. SimaPro. 2017 URL https://simapro.com/, accessed: 2017-12-28.

50. thinkstep. Gabi 8. 2017 URL http://www.gabi-software.com/, accessed: 2017-12-28.

51. Ashby M, Miller A, Rutter F, Seymour C, Wegst U. The CES EduPack Eco SelectorBackground Reading. 2009 [Google Scholar]

52. Esawi AM, Ashby MF. Cost estimation for process selection. (Technical Report). [Google Scholar]

53. Dassault Systems. SOLIDWORKS Sustainability Xpress. 2017 URL http://www.solidworks.com/sw/products/simulation/sustainability-xpress.htm, accessed: 2017-12-28.

54. Sousa MIS, Swack T, Sanders B, Canavera G, White P, Lehman HK. Sustainable design decision support system, uS Patent App. 12/123,211. 2008 [Google Scholar]

55. Volinova L. Proceedings of the Intensive Programe “Renewable Energy Sources”. University of West Bohemia; 2011. Environmental assessment using MECO matrix - case study; pp. 66–72. [Google Scholar]

56. Weitz K, Sharma A, Vigon B, Price E, Norris G, Eagan P, Oens W, Veroutis A. Streamlined life-cycle assessment: a final report from the SETAC North America streamlined LCA workgroup, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, SETAC North America [Google Scholar]

57. Gupta SK, Chen Y, Shaw F, Sriram R. A system for generating process and material selection advice during embodiment design of mechanical components. Journal of manufacturing systems. 2003;22(1):28. [Google Scholar]

58. Smith C, Wright P, Séquin C. The manufacturing advisory service: web-based process and material selection. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 2003;16(6):373–381. [Google Scholar]

59. Goddard PL. Software FMEA techniques. Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2000 Proceedings Annual, IEEE. 2000:118–123. [Google Scholar]

60. Erixon G. Modular function deployment: a method for product modularisation, Royal Inst. of Technology, Department of Manufacturing Systems, Assembly Systems Division. 1998 [Google Scholar]

61. Suzue T, Kohdate A. Variety reduction program, A Production Strategy for Product Diversification, Cambridge, Massachusetts [Google Scholar]

62. Barbau R, Krima S, Rachuri S, Narayanan A, Fiorentini X, Foufou S, Sriram RD. OntoSTEP: Enriching product model data using ontologies. Computer-Aided Design. 2012;44(6):575–590. [Google Scholar]

63. Gero JS, Kannengiesser U. The situated function–behaviour–structure framework, Design studies. 2004;25(4):373–391. [Google Scholar]

64. Ghosh DD, Olewnik A, Lewis K. ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASME; 2016. Product In-Use Context Identification Using Feature Learning Methods. V01BT02A020. [Google Scholar]

65. Sarkar A, Sormaz D. ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2016. Foundation Ontology for Distributed Manufacturing Process Planning. V01BT02A031–V01BT02A031. [Google Scholar]

66. Ameri F, Patil L. Digital manufacturing market: a semantic web-based framework for agile supply chain deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2012;23(5):1817–1832. [Google Scholar]

67. Dinar M, Rosen DW. ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2016. A Design for Additive Manufacturing Ontology. V01BT02A032–V01BT02A032. [Google Scholar]

68. Mani M, Larborn J, Johansson B, Lyons KW, Morris KC. Standard representations for sustainability characterization of industrial processes. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2016;138(10):101008. [Google Scholar]

69. Xu X, Wang L, Newman ST. Computer-aided process planning–A critical review of recent developments and future trends. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 2011;24(1):1–31. [Google Scholar]

70. STEP Tools Inc. STEP and STEP-NC Software for e-manufacturing. 2016 uRL: http://www.steptools.com/

71. Canter N. The possibilities and limitations of dry machining. Tribology & Lubrication Technology. 2009;65(3):40. [Google Scholar]

72. Montross CS, Wei T, Ye L, Clark G, Mai YW. Laser shock processing and its effects on microstructure and properties of metal alloys: a review. International Journal of Fatigue. 2002;24(10):1021–1036. [Google Scholar]

73. Ye H, Liu XY, Hong H. Fabrication of metal matrix composites by metal injection moldinga review. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2008;200(1):12–24. [Google Scholar]

74. Nandan R, DebRoy T, Bhadeshia H. Recent advances in friction-stir welding–process, weldment structure and properties. Progress in Materials Science. 2008;53(6):980–1023. [Google Scholar]

75. Kellens K, Dewulf W, Duflou JR, et al. The CO2PE!-initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing): international framework for sustainable production. Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation: 14th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production (ERSCP) conference and the 6th Environmental Management for Sustainable Universities (EMSU) conference; Delft, The Netherlands. October 25-29, 2010; Delft University of Technology; The Hague University of Applied Sciences; TNO; 2010. pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]

76. Overcash M, Twomey J. Unit Process Life Cycle Inventory (UPLCI)–a structured framework to complete product life cycle studies, in. Leveraging Technology for a Sustainable World, Springer. 2012:1–4. [Google Scholar]

77. Jain A, Ong SP, Hautier G, Chen W, Richards WD, Dacek S, Cholia S, Gunter D, Skinner D, Ceder G, et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. Apl Materials. 2013;1(1):011002. [Google Scholar]

78. Witherell P, Grosse IR, Krishnamurty S, Wileden JC. AIERO: An algorithm for identifying engineering relationships in ontologies. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2013;27(4):555–565. [Google Scholar]

79. Arp R, Smith B, Spear AD. Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology, MIT Press. 2015 [Google Scholar]

80. Furini F, Rai R, Smith B, Colombo G, Krovi V. Proc of the ASME 2016 IDETC & CIE. ASME; 2016. Development of a Manufacturing Ontology for Functionally Graded Materials. V01BT02A030. [Google Scholar]

81. Jung K, Choi S, Kulvatunyou B, Cho H, Morris K. A reference activity model for smart factory design and improvement. Production Planning & Control. 2016:1–15. [Google Scholar]

82. Centobelli P, Cerchione R, Murino T, Gallo M. LAYOUT AND MATERIAL FLOW OPTIMIZATION IN DIGITAL FACTORY. International Journal of Simulation Modelling (IJSIMM) 15(2) [Google Scholar]

83. Despeisse M, Oates MR, Ball PD. Sustainable manufacturing tactics and cross-functional factory modelling. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2013;42:31–41. [Google Scholar]

84. Paju M, Heilala J, Hentula M, Heikkil¨a A, Johansson B, Leong S, Lyons K. Framework and indicators for a sustainable manufacturing mapping methodology. Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2010 Winter, IEEE. 2010:3411–3422. [Google Scholar]

85. Faulkner W, Badurdeen F. Sustainable Value Stream Mapping (Sus-VSM): methodology to visualize and assess manufacturing sustainability performance, Journal of Cleaner Production 85. 2014:8–18. special Volume: Making Progress Towards More Sustainable Societies through Lean and Green Initiatives. [Google Scholar]

86. Yang L, Deuse J, Droste M. Energy efficiency at energy intensive factory - a facility planning approach. 2011 IEEE 18th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. 2011;Part 1:699–703. [Google Scholar]

87. Yang L, Deuse J, Jiang P. Multi-objective optimization of facility planning for energy intensive companies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2013;24(6):1095–1109. [Google Scholar]

88. Riddick F, Lee T. Core Manufacturing Simulation Data (CMSD): A standard representation for manufacturing simulation-related information. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2010 [Google Scholar]

89. Thiede S, Seow Y, Andersson J, Johansson B. Environmental aspects in manufacturing system modelling and simulationState of the art and research perspectives. CIRP Journal of manufacturing science and technology. 2013;6(1):78–87. [Google Scholar]

90. Kibira D, Jain S, Mclean C. A system dynamics modeling framework for sustainable manufacturing, in. Proceedings of the 27th annual system dynamics society conference>, vol. 2009;301:1–22. [Google Scholar]

91. Shao G, Bengtsson N, Johansson B. Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference. Vol. 55. Society for Computer Simulation International; 2010. Interoperability for simulation of sustainable manufacturing. [Google Scholar]

92. Cataldo A, Taisch M, Stahl B. Modelling, simulation and evaluation of energy consumptions for a manufacturing production line. IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. 2013:7537–7542. [Google Scholar]

93. Johansson B, Skoogh A, Mani M, Leong S. Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems. ACM; 2009. Discrete event simulation to generate requirements specification for sustainable manufacturing systems design; pp. 38–42. [Google Scholar]

94. Heilala J, Vatanen S, Tonteri H, Montonen J, Lind S, Johansson B, Stahre J. 2008 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE; 2008. Simulation-based sustainable manufacturing system design; pp. 1922–1930. [Google Scholar]

95. Diaz-Elsayed N, Jondral A, Greinacher S, Dornfeld D, Lanza G. Assessment of lean and green strategies by simulation of manufacturing systems in discrete production environments. CIRP Annals- Manufacturing Technology. 2013;62(1):475–478. [Google Scholar]

96. Choi S, Jung K, Kulvatunyou B, Morris K. An analysis of technologies and standards for designing smart manufacturing systems. J Res Natl Inst Stan. 121 [Google Scholar]

97. Lu Y, Morris KC, Frechette S. Standards landscape and directions for smart manufacturing systems. Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE. 2015:998–1005. [Google Scholar]

98. Lu Y, Morris KC, Frechette S. Current standards landscape for smart manufacturing systems, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR 8107 [Google Scholar]

99. Biel K, Glock CH. Systematic literature review of decision support models for energy-efficient production planning. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2016;101:243–259. [Google Scholar]

100. Gahm C, Denz F, Dirr M, Tuma A. Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: a review and research framework. European Journal of Operational Research. 2016;248(3):744–757. [Google Scholar]

101. Chang Q, Xiao G, Biller S, Li L. Energy saving opportunity analysis of automotive serial production systems (March 2012) IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering. 2013;10(2):334–342. [Google Scholar]

102. Brundage MP, Chang Q, Li Y, Arinez J, Xiao G. Implementing a Real-Time, Energy-Efficient Control Methodology to Maximize Manufacturing Profits. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. 2016;46(6):855–866. [Google Scholar]

103. Zou J, Arinez J, Chang Q, Lei Y. Opportunity Window for Energy Saving and Maintenance in Stochastic Production Systems. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2016;138(12):121009. [Google Scholar]

104. Chen G, Zhang L, Arinez J, Biller S. Energy-efficient production systems through schedule-based operations. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering. 2013;10(1):27–37. [Google Scholar]

105. Legarretaetxebarria A, Quartulli M, Olaizola I, Serrano M. Optimal scheduling of manufacturing processes across multiple production lines by polynomial optimization and bagged bounded binary knapsack. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 2017;11(1):83–91. [Google Scholar]

106. Fang K, Uhan N, Zhao F, Sutherland JW. A new approach to scheduling in manufacturing for power consumption and carbon footprint reduction. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2011;30(4):234–240. selected Papers of 39th North American Manufacturing Research Conference. [Google Scholar]

107. Zhe T, Jiang W. Energy consumption management for multistage production systems considering real time pricing. 2015 34th Chinese Control Conference (CCC) 2015:2627–2632. [Google Scholar]

108. Brundage MP, Chang Q, Li Y, Xiao G, Arinez J. Energy efficiency management of an integrated serial production line and HVAC system. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering. 2014;11(3):789–797. [Google Scholar]

109. Dababneh F, Li L, Sun Z. Peak power demand reduction for combined manufacturing and HVAC system considering heat transfer characteristics. International Journal of Production Economics. 2016;177:44–52. [Google Scholar]

110. Wahren S, Colangelo E, Sauer A, Mandel J, Siegert J. Keeping a Factory in an Energy-optimal State. Procedia CIRP. 2016;40:50–55. [Google Scholar]

111. ISO 22400-1:2014. Automation systems and integration – Key performance indicators (KPIs) for manufacturing operations management – Part 1: Overview, concepts and terminology. International Organization for Standardization; 2014. [Google Scholar]

112. Kibira D, Brundage MP, Feng S, Morris K. Procedure for selecting key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 2018;140(1):011005. [Google Scholar]

113. Jung K, Morris K, Lyons KW, Leong S, Cho H. Mapping strategic goals and operational performance metrics for smart manufacturing systems. Procedia Computer Science. 2015;44:184–193. [Google Scholar]

114. Kibira D, Morris K, Kumaraguru S. Methods and tools for performance assurance of smart manufacturing systems, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR. 8099 [Google Scholar]

115. Li L, Chang Q, Ni J. Data driven bottleneck detection of manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research. 2009;47(18):5019–5036. [Google Scholar]

116. Kuo CT, Lim JT, Meerkov SM. Bottlenecks in serial production lines: A system-theoretic approach. Mathematical problems in engineering. 1996;2(3):233–276. [Google Scholar]

117. Chang Q, Ni J, Bandyopadhyay P, Biller S, Xiao G. Supervisory factory control based on real-time production feedback. Journal of manufacturing science and engineering. 2007;129(3):653–660. [Google Scholar]

118. Wang J, Zhou M, Deng Y. Throughput analysis of discrete event systems based on stochastic Petri nets. International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems. 1999;3(3):343–358. [Google Scholar]

119. Gershwin SB. Manufacturing systems engineering, Prentice Hall. 1994 [Google Scholar]

120. Bodner DA, McGinnis LF. IIE Annual Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1. Institute of Industrial Engineers-Publisher; 2002. A structured approach to simulation modeling of manufacturing systems. [Google Scholar]

121. Law AM, McComas MG. Proceedings of the 30th conference on Winter simulation. IEEE Computer Society Press; 1998. Simulation of manufacturing systems; pp. 49–52. [Google Scholar]

122. Li Y, Chang Q, Biller S, Xiao G. Event-based modelling of distributed sensor networks in battery manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research. 2014;52(14):4239–4252. [Google Scholar]

123. Brundage MP, Chang Q, Li Y, Arinez J, Xiao G. Sustainable manufacturing performance indicators for a serial production line. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering. 2016;13(2):676–687. [Google Scholar]

124. ISO 50001:2011. Energy management systems – Requirementsw with guidance for use. ISO; 2011. [Google Scholar]

125. Helu M, Libes D, Lubell J, Lyons K, Morris KC. Enabling smart manufacturing technologies for decision-making support. ASME 2016 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. 2016 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

126. Brundage MP, Kulvatunyou B, Ademujimi T, Rakshith B. ASME 2017 12th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference collocated with the JSME/ASME 2017 6th International Conference on Materials and Processing. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2017. Smart manufacturing through a framework for a knowledge-based diagnosis system. V003T04A012– V003T04A012. [Google Scholar]

127. Grambow G, Mundbrod N, Steller V, Reichert M. Challenges of applying adaptive processes to enable variability in sustainability data collection. Proc of the 3rd Int’l Symposium on Data-Driven Process Discovery and Analysis (SIMPDA’13), CEUR-WS org. 2013:74–88. [Google Scholar]

128. ISO 14064-1. Greenhouse gases – Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. ISO; 2006. [Google Scholar]

129. Feng SC, Bernstein WZ, Hedberg T, Feeney AB. Toward Knowledge Management for Smart Manufacturing. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. 2017;17(3):031016. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

130. Lilley D. Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions, Design Studies 30 (6) 2009:704–720. [Google Scholar]

131. Rizzoli A, Young W. Delivering environmental decision support systems: software tools and techniques. Environmental Modelling & Software. 1997;12(2):237–249. [Google Scholar]

132. Klein G, Moon B, Hoffman RR. Making sense of sensemaking 2: A macrocognitive model. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2006;21(5):88–92. [Google Scholar]

133. Otto HE, Mueller KG, Kimura F. Efficient information visualization in LCA: Application and practice. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2004;9(1):2–12. [Google Scholar]

134. Bernstein WZ, Ramanujan D, Kulkarni DM, Tew J, Elmqvist N, Zhao F, Ramani K. Mutually coordinated visualization of product and supply chain metadata for sustainable design. Journal of Mechanical Design. 2015;137(12):121101. [Google Scholar]

135. Uchil P, Chakrabarti A. ICoRD15– Research into Design Across Boundaries Volume. Vol. 2. Springer; 2015. An Interface Between Life Cycle Assessment and Design; pp. 251–259. [Google Scholar]

136. Russo D, Serafini M, Rizzi C. TRIZ based computer aided LCA for ecodesign. Computer-Aided Design and Applications. 2016;13(6):816–826. [Google Scholar]

137. Espinosa OJ, Hendrickson C, Garrett J. Domain analysis: a technique to design a user-centered visualization framework. Proc of the 1999 IEEE Symp on InfoVis. 1999:44–52. [Google Scholar]

138. Munzner T, Barsky A, Williams M. Reflections on QuestVis: A Visualization System for an Environ mental Sustainability Model. Scientific Visualization: Interactions Features, Metaphors. 2011;2(240–259):36. [Google Scholar]

139. Ramanujan D, Bernstein WZ, Chandrasegaran SK, Ramani K. Visual Analytics Tools for Sustainable Lifecycle Design: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Opportunities. Journal of Mechanical Design. 2017;139(11):111415. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

140. Mutel C, Cardellini G, Froemelt A, Heeren N, Jaggi A, Marcus M, de Saxceé M, Seong LK, Steubing B. Brightway2 LCA framework. 2015 available at http://brightwaylca.org. Accessed 20-01-2016.

141. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Pret-tenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay E. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2011;12:2825–2830. [Google Scholar]

142. Bostock M, Ogievetsky V, Heer J. D3 data-driven documents, IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics. 2011;17(12):2301–2309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

143. Kuczenski B, Beraha S. Antelope: A Web service for publishing Life Cycle Assessment models and results. Proceedings of the 2015 ISSST. 2015:1–8. [Google Scholar]

144. Sedlmair M, Isenberg P, Baur D, Butz A. Information visualization evaluation in large companies: Challenges, experiences and recommendations, Information Visualization. 2011;10(3):248–266. [Google Scholar]

145. Bernstein WZ, Subramaniyan AB, Brodsky A, Garretson IC, Haapala KR, Libes D, Morris K, Pan R, Prabhu V, Sarkar A, Shankar Raman A, Wu Z. Research Directions for an Open Unit Manufacturing Process Repository: A Collaborative Vision, Manufacturing Letters [Google Scholar]

Page 2

Relationships between SIMA activities and the traditional product lifecycle. Red and blue arrows indicate material and information flow, respectively. The dotted blue arrows indicate feedback to other activities/stages that could improve environmental decisions.

Click on the image to see a larger version.