How long do wives outlive husbands

HEIDI DOUGLASS |

Yes, it’s true.  Women live longer than men.  In fact not only does evidence suggest that we females have always outlived the blokes, it appears that as more time passes the gap is increasing.  Currently Australian women can expect to live, on average, 5 years longer than our male counterparts, which is the same for most developed nations of the world.  Why is this so?

No-one knows for sure, but there are a number of theories.  According to CHeBA’s Co-Director Professor Perminder Sachdev, the first thing that people will say about this topic is that women have healthier habits and he thinks to some extent this is true.  Women tend to smoke less, drink less, eat better and generally take care of their bodies.  This may be a factor, but according to Professor Sachdev this isn’t a sufficient explanation because of a paradox, which is that even though women live longer than men, statistics show that they acquire more illnesses and visit doctors more than men. 

So what about stress?  Historically men have had the stress of going to work everyday to support the family and had to periodically go off and fight wars.  Surely “life stress” has hindered men?  Apparently not.  Even though women’s lives have increased in stress with the elimination of male-female role stereotyping in the second half of the century, and the combined pressures of work and home on women, they still manage to live longer.  Hence, stress isn’t a good explanation either.  So what is?

I posed this question to my family, who, despite being in long and (so I thought) loving relationships, were all fairly cynical about the longevity of women.  One family member told me: “They need to see their husbands die and the power of will is amazing”.  No, that didn’t come from a female.    

My surrogate grandmother, a mid-70s German that has lived in Australia for more than 50 years, made some sense.  According to her, “there are biological differences related to hormones and childbearing [that make women live longer].  They are also better equipped to cope, and when husbands die earlier can look after themselves better than widowed men.”

My sister-in-law also made an interesting point, stating that “women are less susceptible to cell damage which is also why more girls are born than boys.”

My partner, in the health and fitness industry, may also be close to the mark with his statement that “women store body fat differently to men.  The theory is that men immediately store body fat around their internal organs whereas a woman tends to store it in their hips and thighs (to protect the child bearing process).  This disadvantage to men does not tend to affect women to the same extent until after menopause.”

My sister, (married for 15 years with four children), thinks it is “because we have more heart”. According to my mum women are just waiting a very long time for a break.  And from my dad?  Apparently "men can only take so much".      

Hmm…on that note, let’s head back to the expert. 

According to Professor Sachdev, we need to try to understand why we age.  What are the processes at the biological level that make us age? 

“We need to understand this because when you look at other species like rats or chimpanzees - even in those species females tend to have an advantage over males,” he says. 

“A female rat in a laboratory will live longer than males.  The female or worker honeybee lives a relatively long life whereas the male counterparts only live for a day or 2, with the express purpose of mating with the queen bee, and this is true of a number of other species as well.” 

“People have looked at the reasons for this from various viewpoints.  One popular theory for ageing is the wear and tear theory; that as cells divide, some defects accumulate in the cell, both in the DNA and the proteins that are formed.  The body has a mechanism by which you can repair these defects and it is suggested that women do a better job of repairing these defects at a cellular level than men, and gradually with ageing the individuals that have a better repair mechanism will survive longer than those that do not.  Hence, a major reason for women living longer than men is at the genetic level. And an obvious and major difference at the genetic level for women is that they have two X Chromosomes whereas men only have one X chromosome.  The second major difference is in the hormones themselves.  Women have oestrogen as a major hormone through their adult lives rather than testosterone - although of course after menopause that changes for women.”

It would appear that while testosterone gives men advantages in early life such as in increased muscle strength, it may actually be at a long-term cost for ageing.  Oestrogen early in life is, on the other hand, a key factor in providing protective effects from the wear and tear mechanisms that are inevitable in the body. 

According to Professor Sachdev, it has been shown that male animals have a tendency to live longer if they have been castrated.  Scary thought for men!  Historical evidence suggests that castrated men tend to live longer than uncastrated ones by about 14 years. 

The fact is that a female child born today is likely to live into the early 90s, with far more women reaching this age than men.  Western societies continue to see an increase in the lifespan and no one knows how far that will go.  So far the longest living person (a woman) with a well-documented age died at 122.

Australia’s only study of centenarians is conducted by the Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA).  With the centenarian population being the fastest growing demographic and predictions that by 2050 there will be over 2 million centenarians internationally (with up to 50,000 in Australia), it is worth finding out why this is so.  And why the majority of centenarians are women. 

As Professor Sachdev says, “It is not without reason that we call nature Mother Nature”.

Everywhere in the world women live longer than men – but this was not always the case. The available data from rich countries shows that women didn’t live longer than men in the 19th century. Why do women live so much longer than men today, and why has this advantage increased over time? The evidence is limited and we only have partial answers. We know that biological, behavioral and environmental factors all contribute to the fact that women live longer than men; but we don’t know exactly how strong the relative contribution of each of these factors is.

Independently of the exact weight, we know that at least part of the reason why women live so much longer than men today, but not in the past, has to do with the fact that some key non-biological factors have changed. What are these changing factors? Some are well known and relatively straightforward, like the fact that men smoke more often. Others are more complicated. For example, there is evidence that in rich countries the female advantage increased in part because infectious diseases used to affect women disproportionately a century ago, so advances in medicine that reduced the long-term health burden from infectious diseases, especially for survivors, ended up raising women’s longevity disproportionately.

The first chart below shows life expectancy at birth for men and women. As we can see, all countries are above the diagonal parity line – this means in all countries a newborn girl can expect to live longer than a newborn boy.1

Interestingly, this chart shows that while the female advantage exists everywhere, the cross-country differences are large. In Russia women live 10 years longer than men; in Bhutan the difference is less than half a year.

How long do wives outlive husbands

Click to open interactive version

Let’s now look at how the female advantage in longevity has changed over time. The next chart plots male and female life expectancy at birth in the US over the period 1790-2014. Two points stand out.

First, there is an upward trend: Men and women in the US live much, much longer today than a century ago. This is in line with historical increases in life expectancy everywhere in the world.

And second, there is a widening gap: The female advantage in life expectancy used to be very small, but it grew substantially over the last century.

Using the option ‘Change country’ on the chart, you can check that these two points also apply to the other countries with available data: Sweden, France and the UK.

(NB. In case you are curious, the big dip in life expectancy in the US around 1918 corresponds to the Spanish flu pandemic.)

How long do wives outlive husbands

Click to open interactive version

In most countries child mortality is higher among boys than girls.2 How much of the female advantage in longevity is really a story about male disadvantages in infant mortality?

In poor countries where child mortality is high, these sex differences in mortality are obviously an important factor driving differences in life expectancy. But in rich countries, where fewer children die, and where sex differences in infant mortality are very small, the male disadvantage in infant mortality cannot explain much of the observed differences in life expectancy.

Available evidence shows that child mortality rates in today’s rich countries were higher for male than female infants in the 19th century, and the male disadvantage in child mortality grew through the first half of the 20th century, as health outcomes improved. Similarly, maternal mortality in these countries used to be very high, and it decreased dramatically over the 20th century.

However, as the chart here shows, in France, Sweden, the US and the UK, the life expectancy of women conditional on reaching age 45, was also higher than that of men, and the difference grew through the first half of the 20th century reaching a peak between 1970 and 1980.

Changes in child and maternal mortality do have an impact on life expectancy differences between men and women, but they cannot fully explain the rise in the longevity gap that we’ve observed in rich countries over the last century.

(NB. For the same countries plotted in the chart below, you can explore long-run differences in life expectancy at ages 0, 15 and 45 in this interactive chart)

How long do wives outlive husbands

Click to open interactive version

The evidence shows that differences in chromosomes and hormones between men and women affect longevity. For example, males tend to have more fat surrounding the organs (they have more ‘visceral fat’) whereas women tend to have more fat sitting directly under the skin (‘subcutaneous fat’). This difference is determined both by estrogen and the presence of the second X chromosome in females; and it matters for longevity because fat surrounding the organs predicts cardiovascular disease.3

But biological differences can only be part of the story – otherwise we’d not see such large differences across countries and over time. What else could be going on?

We do not have a definitive answer, but we do have some clues. For example, we know that changes in smoking habits among men have affected mortality patterns.4 And we know that historical medical advances have affected health outcomes for men and women differently. A 2018 study by Adriana Lleras-Muney and Claudia Goldin, looking at long-run data on infectious diseases, gives us insights into this mechanism.5

Lleras-Muney and Goldin show that in the US, infectious diseases disproportionately affected females between the ages of 5 and 25 in the 19th century, so as the burden of infectious disease fell for both men and women, it disproportionately helped women.6

We know that the longer lifespan of females is common in other animals, but it is not universal.7 We also know that biological, behavioral and environmental factors all contribute to the fact that women live longer than men; but we don’t know exactly how strong the relative contribution of each of these factors is.

As the chart here shows, in most countries for all the primary causes of death the mortality rates are higher for men. More detailed data shows that this is true at all ages; yet paradoxically, while women have lower mortality rates throughout their life, they also often have higher rates of physical illness, more disability days, more doctor visits, and hospital stays than men do.8 It seems women do not live longer than men only because they age more slowly, but also because they are more robust when they get sick at any age. This is an interesting point that still needs more research.

How long do wives outlive husbands

Click to open interactive version

An interesting point raised in the study by Adriana Lleras-Muney and Claudia Goldin, is that the disproportionate longevity gain that women enjoyed from reductions in infectious diseases in the 20th century across rich countries, was not about direct benefits from reduced mortality. The direct reduction in deaths due to infectious diseases was important, but it was not the main factor explaining the growth in the life expectancy gap between men and women. In terms of the gap, what seems to have made a difference was the long-run indirect effect for survivors: Those who survive infectious diseases often carry a health burden that affects organs and this makes them more vulnerable later on in life. Rheumatic fever, for example, often damages the valves of the heart and leads to rheumatic heart disease later in life.

This relationship between infectious disease in early life and later-life health has been recognized in the medical sciences; but there are few estimates of the impact at the population level. So the sizeable impact on life expectancy found by Lleras-Muney and Goldin actually has practical relevance for policy today – it suggests that in places where mortality from infectious diseases remains high, the return from investing in treating these diseases may be much larger than we think, because of the long-run indirect health benefits for survivors.

As we were writing this article we reviewed many academic articles, some of which are not directly referenced in the text above. We have compiled them in this short literature review document.

  1. To be more precise, this chart shows male and female estimates of what is called “period life expectancy”. That means these estimates correspond to the average number of years a newborn infant can expect to live, under the assumption that prevailing patterns of mortality at the time of its birth stayed constant throughout its life. You can read more about what life expectancy is and how it is measured here.

  2. The questions of why there are differences in child mortality for boys and girls, and why they have changed over time, are obviously interesting and important in their own right. The male disadvantage in infant mortality in rich countries underwent a surprising rise and fall in the 20th century. Drevenstedt et al. (2008) write: “Although one might expect that innate biological differences between males and females would result in a constant level of the excess vulnerability of males, our analysis shows that biological differences are highly sensitive to both the medical-technical and epidemiological contexts. During the great historical improvements in infant mortality, the rising male disadvantage in infancy revealed a level of unexpected male vulnerability. […] Changes in obstetrical practice and neonatal medicine that saved all but the weakest babies have benefited boys more than girls because boys were more vulnerable across the entire range of birth weights.” The full reference is Drevenstedt, G. L., Crimmins, E. M., Vasunilashorn, S., & Finch, C. E. (2008). The rise and fall of excess male infant mortality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(13), 5016-5021. Available online here.

  3. The evidence regarding the impact that biological differences between men and women can have on longevity is complex and there are many open questions, since it is hard to disentangle genetic, hormonal, behavioral and environmental factors. For this reason, some of the evidence on specific mechanisms comes from lab experiments with animals. For example, studies on mice have been able to establish that the presence of the second X chromosome may have a direct impact on health outcomes keeping hormones and other factors constant (male mice being more likely to suffer from hypertension even in the absence of different hormones).

  4. Preston, S. H., & Wang, H. (2006). Sex mortality differences in the United States: The role of cohort smoking patterns. Demography, 43(4), 631-646. Available online here.

  5. The full reference of the study is: Goldin, C., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2018). XX> XY?: The Changing Female Advantage in Life Expectancy (No. w24716). National Bureau of Economic Research. Available online here.

  6. The authors point out that it is hard to know exactly why infectious diseases disproportionately affected females between the ages of 5 and 25 in the 19th century. “It does not seem to have been caused by relative deprivation. Young females must also have had greater exposure to infectious disease than young males, that is a greater morbidity rate, and carried with them, through life, the scarring effects of early illnesses.”

  7. Among wild animals, the female longevity advantage has been observed for example in chimpanzees and whales; but it has not been observed in macaques and baboons. Studies with captive animals, giving identical treatment to males and females, have found a female advantage in rats, but not in some types of mice. You can find more references, plus some caveats on how to interpret the evidence, in Austad, S. N., & Fischer, K. E. (2016). Sex differences in lifespan. Cell metabolism, 23(6), 1022-1033. Available online here.

  8. Austad, S. N. (2006). Why women live longer than men: sex differences in longevity. Gender medicine, 3(2), 79-92). Available online here.

All visualizations, data, and code produced by Our World in Data are completely open access under the Creative Commons BY license. You have the permission to use, distribute, and reproduce these in any medium, provided the source and authors are credited.

The data produced by third parties and made available by Our World in Data is subject to the license terms from the original third-party authors. We will always indicate the original source of the data in our documentation, so you should always check the license of any such third-party data before use and redistribution.

All of our charts can be embedded in any site.